Are you aware of this reality of Kashmir ...
Whenever there is unrest and violence in the Kashmir Valley, then it is said that the youth are unemployed, frustrated with government help and programs. But people of the country should know that the per capita income of at least seven states in the country is less than the per capita income of Jammu and Kashmir.
In terms of population, the central government gets more help from states like Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Bihar, Jharkhand and Kashmir. Even in education, six states are in bad shape from Jammu and Kashmir, but the youth of these states do not throw stones on the security forces nor do the self-respecting human rights defenders thwart their respect to these states.
There are 20 thousand 306 government hospitals across the country, the highest of which is 3145 in Rajasthan. Second is 2812 hospitals with Jammu and Kashmir. All Central Universities have quota for students of Jammu and Kashmir and they also get special scholarship. About 99 million people of the state's nearly twenty-five million people take advantage of subsidized ration from the government.
Whoever lifted the sky over Article 370, tell us that no amount of money given to Kashmir is given to any other state of India? It can be understood that there have been many political flaws in connecting Kashmir with India, but who is making Wahabi-Salafi, Kashmir's alleged struggle? Kashmiri Awam is not responsible for making the entire struggle communal by expelling Pandits from the Valley? The question is how did Kashmir join India?
Was it the greed of King Harisinh? Who sent Pakistani soldiers in the disguise of tribals? Who was showing Harisinh the desire to fill his vacancy in the empty letter ... who were not ready to release Sher-e-Kashmir from prison. From Srinagar to the alleged tribal, Harisinh sought help from Hindustan. The condition was that the release of Sheikh Abdullah and merger in India ... and why not? As a nation Kashmir is our strategic-strategic force. Since then, Kashmiri local leaders and Kashmiri people have not left any opportunity to blackmail India.
The Central Government gave so much help to separatist leaders (who are more separatist less traitors) who were found on pieces of Pakistan, that they felt that now governments can be found more intimidating by intimidating them. Was it right in the right sense, because of the alleged fear of Muslims in Hindus, Hindus in Pakistan? The Muslims feared that they would be oppressed, they would have religious persecution but when Hindu pundits were beaten and beaten by the Kashmir Valley, then did the central government of the Hindu majority country help the Pandits?
Then did the Hindus protest violently? Has the Kashmiri Pandit become a suicide bomber? The reality is that cowardice is so full of Indian and especially Hindu mindset that they can never change themselves. Hundreds of thousands of years of slavery have taught us that the second does nothing to do with us, we do not have to take up arms. The so-called secularist leftist and liberal thinkers will show that will there ever be a change in the Quran and hadiths? Never and at no cost.
In terms of population, the central government gets more help from states like Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Bihar, Jharkhand and Kashmir. Even in education, six states are in bad shape from Jammu and Kashmir, but the youth of these states do not throw stones on the security forces nor do the self-respecting human rights defenders thwart their respect to these states.
There are 20 thousand 306 government hospitals across the country, the highest of which is 3145 in Rajasthan. Second is 2812 hospitals with Jammu and Kashmir. All Central Universities have quota for students of Jammu and Kashmir and they also get special scholarship. About 99 million people of the state's nearly twenty-five million people take advantage of subsidized ration from the government.
Whoever lifted the sky over Article 370, tell us that no amount of money given to Kashmir is given to any other state of India? It can be understood that there have been many political flaws in connecting Kashmir with India, but who is making Wahabi-Salafi, Kashmir's alleged struggle? Kashmiri Awam is not responsible for making the entire struggle communal by expelling Pandits from the Valley? The question is how did Kashmir join India?
Was it the greed of King Harisinh? Who sent Pakistani soldiers in the disguise of tribals? Who was showing Harisinh the desire to fill his vacancy in the empty letter ... who were not ready to release Sher-e-Kashmir from prison. From Srinagar to the alleged tribal, Harisinh sought help from Hindustan. The condition was that the release of Sheikh Abdullah and merger in India ... and why not? As a nation Kashmir is our strategic-strategic force. Since then, Kashmiri local leaders and Kashmiri people have not left any opportunity to blackmail India.
The Central Government gave so much help to separatist leaders (who are more separatist less traitors) who were found on pieces of Pakistan, that they felt that now governments can be found more intimidating by intimidating them. Was it right in the right sense, because of the alleged fear of Muslims in Hindus, Hindus in Pakistan? The Muslims feared that they would be oppressed, they would have religious persecution but when Hindu pundits were beaten and beaten by the Kashmir Valley, then did the central government of the Hindu majority country help the Pandits?
Then did the Hindus protest violently? Has the Kashmiri Pandit become a suicide bomber? The reality is that cowardice is so full of Indian and especially Hindu mindset that they can never change themselves. Hundreds of thousands of years of slavery have taught us that the second does nothing to do with us, we do not have to take up arms. The so-called secularist leftist and liberal thinkers will show that will there ever be a change in the Quran and hadiths? Never and at no cost.
Why are unreasonable demands ... read next page ....
Therefore, the Republic of India made a written law of acceptance of all kinds of fair and indecent demands or appeasement to bring about a change in the Muslims. As far as Pakistan is responsible behind the Islamicization of Kashmir, more leaders and political parties are responsible for what is ready to do anything for the sake of vote. All national, state level parties are responsible for this.
The way Congress, BJP, SP, BSP, RJD and Trinamool Congress and other regional parties have made such a plea to Muslims that if there is no jihadi threat in India in the next decade, then there should be no surprises. In this way, many leaders cry out of Hindu terrorism but can they name the name of such a hardcore Hindu who has created history of becoming a suicide bomber?
Does not the leaders of the country see that what is happening in the valley is sponsored by Pakistan, where the Jihadi group Hizbullah has become a part of the government in the way of Hamas? It is also almost certain that in Pakistan, Islamist terrorism has reached the barracks of the army from mosques and its next target will be a country like Bangladesh.
The main reason for Jihadi ideology's flourishing is that the imagination of the nation-state has been disrupted internationally. Also, because the institutions like the United Nations have become the powerless and powerful custodians of the nations, the next source of jihadism is the Middle East, where all the powerful countries including the US have not avoided giving them state-of-the-art weapons. The attitude of America in this case is completely contradictory, which in a way has been fighting against terror, and on the other hand, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, UAE and Pakistan have no hesitation in destabilizing their neighbors and spreading Islamism. Left
But, in the 80's decade of assembly elections, the Muslim United Front lost in defeat so much that its leader Syed Ali Shah Geelani and his colleagues went with Pakistan and pro-separatist leaders. In this election, the then central government has rigged together to win the Congress supporters, the National Conference. After this, an atmosphere started in Kashmir against the Kashmiri Pandits. Not only this, after the killing of 109 pundits in 1989, the Pandits started fleeing from the hills and started fleeing. At the center of the Congress, President's rule was imposed in Kashmir. Pak supporters started harassing the masses in the valley.
And as far as the Pakistan-sponsored terrorism is concerned, the terrorists who first brought this into monsters, later established them in the countries of the Middle East and in Afghanistan. By eating religious fanaticism in the Middle East, these jihadi factions became so powerful that they started challenging countries like America and Russia. Religious fanaticism is in our medieval history when Guru Teghbahadur in Delhi had refused to change his religion and was murdered along with his sons.
India has been facing small jihadis for a long time. The entire district of a whole of Kerala has become a manor of Muslims and a Christian professor's hand was cut off because he had asked such a question in the question paper, which caused the insult of the Prophet, Islam. Not only this, in India it happens with so much frequency that sometimes it seems that we are living in Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and in India the Hindu population is not a majority but minority.
In the year 1901, American refugee William McKinley killed a refugee. This person was also very impressed with the philosophy of Jihad. We must understand that Islam is a philosophy, it is a religion, a system of thoughts, an ideology, a particular kind of politics and movement of ideas. It is everything in itself and you can understand Islamism as a method of Islam, and Jihad is the armed version of Islam's ideology. It works in both ways, even peacefully and violencefully. This ideology holds the distraction of taking the entire world back in the fourteenth century.
This is the reality of jihad ... on the next page ...
As far as India is concerned, Muslims have already got an exemption here that they should settle matters related to marriage, divorce and wakf according to their own Shariah. While everyone knows that this is the suppression of the rights of the judicial system of the democratic country and the rights of women. Leftist, fascist and jihadist, basically it is a written section and the person who is different from the general.
Information about a book 'and the sword broke up' in the 'New World' Urdu weekly, which was published sometime back from Delhi, has been printed. Nasim Hijaji, a scholar writer, emphasized the need for creating a jihadist mindset in the minds of Indian Muslims. The newspaper also printed that U.S. President Barack Obama plans to drop nuclear bomb on Kaba, located in Mecca.
It has been said about the President who has never allowed any such word 'Muslim terrorism' to be included in government documents in his two tenures. Who is considered to be Saudi Arabia's closest ally and business associate. During his tenure, Obama has provided the funds for the record money alone to Saudi Arabia, and helped Turkey to help root out Islamic terrorism in Egypt and the Middle East. Obama is the President of a democratic country and our country also follows democracy. Therefore, whenever terrorism raises the head, we try to resolve all the issues with mutual consultation.
Terrorism of Kashmir is no exception, and big leaders, intellectuals and experts say that the solution of Kashmir will also come out of the dialogue. But when, do not know? We want two separate separatists, either freedom to meet Pakistan or independence to meet with the so-called 'Azad Kashmir'. But we have always been saying that Kashmir is an integral part of India, but in whose Rome and Rome is Pakistan? Can we give this part to Pakistan too? This question is not only of the Sunnis of the Pakistan side of the valley. There are Shiites in the valley, Sikhs, Hindus, Buddhists want to live in India but separatists want that the whole state be made only Muslim state?
Can we kneel in front of a few people who want to solve any problem with the sword? Then the question is who to talk to and how much to talk? What is the anger of the people? Does not there education of youth education-issues such as health-employment? Kashmir is a political problem but India is the only democratic country in the world where anti-nationalists, traitors are placed on their heads.
China puts the tribunal verdict in a junk basket, but on the basis of fear, America can ruin many countries of the world, but if we talk of crushing violent people, then this human rights are abusive? Fierce attack on soldiers, snatching or killing their weapons is not a small crime, but it comes under the scope of sedition. But even then our country's intellectuals, leaders, political parties want us to also allow our soldiers to kill. The exemption of the killing of soldiers who win their wars by giving their lives and who lose their leader in the treaty, the tables of negotiations. After all, the sacrifice of these soldiers, whether there is any cost of blood or not?
No comments: